<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scrump &#187; data portability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scrump.com/tag/data-portability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scrump.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How Open Data Will Spread</title>
		<link>http://blog.scrump.com/2009/01/12/how-open-data-will-spread/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.scrump.com/2009/01/12/how-open-data-will-spread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>petef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data portability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scrump.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was watching Andrea Vascellari's video post on the Blogger Roundtable on Data Portability at the Web 2.0 Expo in Berlin last Oct. A few minutes in there is a nice quote from Tim O'Reilly:


  What will really kill the proprietary data silos is that somebody will figure out an architectural solution or a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching Andrea Vascellari's video post on the <a href="http://www.andreavascellari.com/?p=1236">Blogger Roundtable on Data Portability</a> at the Web 2.0 Expo in Berlin last Oct. A few minutes in there is a nice quote from Tim O'Reilly:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What will really kill the proprietary data silos is that somebody will figure out an architectural solution or a type of program or whatever, something that spreads wildly that actually depends on free data and open data. And that free and open data architecture - that takes over the world unexpectedly because it works, because it matters, because it enables new things - is what will undermine the proprietary data silos not the fact that we've tried to legislate it.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>That certainly rings true to me.</p>

<p>A couple of days later I read Chris Saad's <a href="http://blog.dataportability.org/index.php/2008/12/the-data-portability-landscape-an-update/">The Data Portability Landscape &mdash; An Update</a> which has the following brilliant (if optimistic) quote:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Closed platforms are like ice cubes in a glass of water. They will float for a while. They will change the temperature of the liquid beneath. Ultimately, however, the ice cube must eventually melt into the wider web.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Putting the two together makes me think that whereas it might be tempting to view the success of a proprietary solution like Facebook Connect as a failure of the open data portability movement, it's also possible to see it as a driver for more open development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scrump.com/2009/01/12/how-open-data-will-spread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
